used in assessing the level of training of students.

Knowledge is tested and assessed in the course of the current classes, either orally or in writing. Written work is carried out on significant issues of the topic or section of the OBZH course. Control written work is carried out after studying the sections of the OBZH course program at the end of the quarter and the academic year. In the OBZh course, a credit test of knowledge can be used.

Teaching life safety, like other subjects, provides for individual - thematic control of students' knowledge. Moreover, when checking the level of mastering the material on each sufficiently large topic, it is mandatory to evaluate two main elements: theoretical knowledge and the ability to apply them when choosing practical ones.

To control the knowledge of life safety, various types of work are used (tests, express polls, independent, verification, control, practical, situational tasks).

Criteria for evaluation

Assessment of students' oral responses.

Rating "5" posed in the event that the student shows a correct understanding of the issues under consideration, gives precise formulations and interpretation of basic concepts, builds an answer according to his own plan, accompanies the story with examples, knows how to apply knowledge in a new situation when performing practical tasks; can establish a connection between the studied and previously studied material in the course of life safety, as well as with the material learned in the study of other subjects.

Rating "4" is posed if the student's answer meets the basic requirements for the answer to the mark "5", but is given without using his own plan, new examples, without applying knowledge in a new situation, without using connections with previously studied material and material learned in the study of other subjects; if the student made one mistake or no more than two shortcomings and can correct them on their own or with a little help from the teacher.

Rating "3" is posed if the student correctly understands the essence of the question in question, but the answer contains separate gaps in the assimilation of the questions of the OBZH course, which do not interfere with the further assimilation of the program material; knows how to apply the knowledge gained when solving simple problems using stereotyped solutions, but finds it difficult to solve problems that require deeper approaches in assessing phenomena and events; made no more than one gross error and two shortcomings, not more than one gross and one non-gross error, no more than two or three non-gross errors, one non-gross error and three shortcomings; made four or five faults.

Rating "2" is put if the student has not mastered the basic knowledge and skills in accordance with the requirements of the program and made more mistakes and shortcomings than necessary for grade 3.

When assessing the oral answers of students, it is advisable to conduct an element-by-element analysis of the answer based on the program requirements for the basic knowledge and skills of students, as well as the structural elements of some types of knowledge and skills, the assimilation of which should be considered mandatory learning outcomes.

Evaluation of written tests.

Rating "5" is awarded for work done completely without errors and shortcomings.

Rating "4" is awarded for a work completed in full, but if it contains no more than one blunder and one defect, no more than three defects.

Rating "3" is posed if the student correctly completed at least 2/3 of the entire work or made no more than one gross error and two shortcomings, no more than one gross and one non-gross error, no more than three non-gross errors, one non-gross error and three shortcomings, in the presence of four five shortcomings.

Rating "2" is put if the number of errors and shortcomings exceeded the norm for grade 3 or less than 2/3 of the entire work was done correctly.

Evaluation of practical work.

Rating "5" is put if the student performs practical work in full, observing the required sequence of actions, independently and correctly chooses the necessary equipment; conducts all techniques in conditions and modes that ensure the receipt of correct results and conclusions; complies with the requirements of safety regulations.

Rating "4" is set if the requirements for grade 5 are met, but two or three shortcomings were made, no more than one blunder and one defect.

Rating "3" set if the work is not completed completely, but the volume of the completed part is such that it allows you to get the correct result and conclusion; if mistakes were made during the reception.

Rating "2" is set if the work is not completed in full and the volume of the completed part of the work does not allow making the correct conclusions; if the techniques were performed incorrectly.

In all cases, the score is reduced if the student did not follow the safety rules.

Control and measuring materials are compiled in accordance with the requirements of the state standard for life safety, the level of training of students. Verification works consist of questions and tasks that meet the requirements of the basic level, both in volume and depth.

Knowledge is tested and assessed in the course of the current classes, either orally or in writing. Written work is carried out on significant issues of the topic or section of the OBZH course. Control written work is carried out after studying the sections of the OBZH course program at the end of the quarter and the academic year. In the OBZh course, a credit test of knowledge can be used.

To control the knowledge of life safety, various types of work are used (tests, express polls, independent, verification, control, practical, situational tasks)

Assessment of students' oral responses.

Grade "5" is given if the student shows a correct understanding of the issues under consideration, gives precise formulations and interpretation of basic concepts, builds an answer according to his own plan, accompanies the story with examples, knows how to apply knowledge in a new situation when performing practical tasks; can establish a connection between the studied and previously studied material in the course of life safety, as well as with the material learned in the study of other subjects.

The mark "4" is given if the student's answer meets the basic requirements for the answer to the mark "5", but is given without using his own plan, new examples, without applying knowledge in a new situation, without using connections with previously studied material and material learned during the study other items; if the student made one mistake or no more than two shortcomings and can correct them on their own or with a little help from the teacher.

The mark "3" is given if the student correctly understands the essence of the question in question, but the answer contains separate gaps in the assimilation of the questions of the OBZH course, which do not interfere with the further assimilation of the program material; knows how to apply the knowledge gained when solving simple problems using stereotyped solutions, but finds it difficult to solve problems that require deeper approaches in assessing phenomena and events; made no more than one gross error and two shortcomings, not more than one gross and one non-gross error, no more than two or three non-gross errors, one non-gross error and three shortcomings; made four or five faults.

Grade "2" is given if the student has not mastered the basic knowledge and skills in accordance with the requirements of the program and made more mistakes and shortcomings than necessary for grade 3.

Grade "1" is given if the student is unable to answer any of the questions.

When assessing the oral answers of students, it is advisable to conduct an element-by-element analysis of the answer based on the program requirements for the basic knowledge and skills of students, as well as the structural elements of some types of knowledge and skills, the assimilation of which should be considered mandatory learning outcomes. Below are generalized plans of the main elements.

Evaluation of written tests.

The mark "5" is given for the work performed completely without errors and shortcomings.

The score "4" is given for the work performed in full, but if there is no more than one blunder and one defect in it, no more than three defects.

The mark "3" is given if the student correctly completed at least 2/3 of the entire work or made no more than one gross mistake and two shortcomings, no more than one gross and one non-gross error, no more than three non-gross errors, one non-gross error and three shortcomings, in the presence of four or five shortcomings.

Grade "2" is given if the number of errors and shortcomings exceeded the norm for grade 3 or less than 2/3 of the entire work was done correctly.

Grade "1" is given if the student has not completed a single task at all.

Evaluation of practical work.

The mark "5" is given if a student performs practical work in full, observing the necessary sequence of actions, independently and correctly chooses the necessary equipment; conducts all techniques in conditions and modes that ensure the receipt of correct results and conclusions; complies with the requirements of safety regulations.

A score of "4" is given if the requirements for score 5 are met, but two or three shortcomings were made, no more than one major mistake and one shortcoming.

The mark "3" is given if the work is not completed in full, but the amount of the completed part is such that it allows you to get the correct result and conclusion; if mistakes were made during the reception.

A score of "2" is given if the work is not completed in full and the volume of the completed part of the work does not allow making correct conclusions; if the techniques were performed incorrectly.

A grade of "1" is given if the student has not completed the practical work at all.

In all cases, the score is reduced if the student did not follow the safety rules.

The system of control and assessment of the quality of knowledge in the lessons of life safety.

For a teacher-organizer of life safety at school, the problem of assessing the quality of students' knowledge is relevant for the reason that there are no clearly defined criteria for this subject. There are general requirements for the oral answer of students, requirements for the verification of written works.

However, the specificity of the OBZH course is that with a lack of hours, and this is exactly the case, the question arises of introducing express control methods, such as tests, dictations and others.

When carrying out quality control of knowledge in OBZH lessons, I use various forms of control:

preliminary;

auxiliary;

current;

thematic

final.

Preliminary control- allows you to identify the knowledge that will be emphasized in the future when presenting new material

Auxiliary control- is carried out by the teacher to establish the most difficult to learn elements of the lesson.

Current control- is carried out at the end of each separate topic and covers the knowledge of the previous ones. to secure the material.

Thematic control- carried out to check the assimilation of the material of the section

Final control- after completing a course consisting of several sections or the entire course as a whole.

When carrying out quality control of knowledge, I use its various methods.

Verbal control

student's monologue answer in question-and-answer form

the requirements for this type of control are a correctly asked question, listening to the answer to the end.

It can be performed as current in individual, frontal or combined form.

When conducting this type of control, various survey techniques can be used, the choice of which depends on the level of preparedness of students, the degree of proficiency in their monologue speech, and the psychological characteristics of each child.

I use oral questioning when the question does not require spending time on long deliberation, thus only the knowledge of the first (reproductive) level is verified.

cards with questions, (carried out in the case when it takes time to think about a question, as a rule, these are questions of all levels, preparation for such a survey technique may or may not be given time to think about the answer, it is better to use when it is necessary to establish the cause investigative connections of the second and higher order)

work with supporting notes, (used when checking knowledge on the basis of a previously given supporting outline with the restoration of its individual parts or its full / partial retelling, used for children with well-developed visual memory and to consolidate visual images and signs)

documents with their analysis, (it is used as a survey of the second and third levels of complexity, while the ability to highlight the main thing is formed on the basis of already acquired knowledge)

ticket system (most often used in examinations and tests, requires a well-developed monologue speech, and is carried out at the end of a large section, or the entire course as a whole, when drawing up a ticket survey form, the topics of each of them should cover all topics in one ticket)

The main disadvantage of oral questioning is the subjective attitude of the teacher to the student.

Written control

The written answer of the student, which most fully reveals the essence of the question in a logical sequence, can be carried out both in an individual and frontal form. The main requirement for a written survey is sufficient time for writing an answer, which depends on the individual characteristics of the students.

Written survey techniques:

survey on cards (test), this survey technique is carried out, as a rule, when knowledge is revealed in two directions of deep assimilation of a separately passed topic or as a control slice for the assimilation of individual concepts of a whole section, cards can contain questions of all levels,

dictation is a technique in which express diagnostics of the assimilation of the passed material is possible. The peculiarity lies in the fact that the number of answer options is quite limited, as a rule, no more than 5, and does not give a full assessment of the depth of the acquired knowledge, in addition to this, sentences of dictations should be made up of no more than 9 words, which is due to the psychological characteristics of a person, here they are quite high requirements for the very compilation of the question, which should not be drawn up in the form of a complex or even more difficult subordinate sentence, when using this type of survey, the maximum level of questions is the second. The most primitive dictation is a dictation with yes no answers.

test when using this control technique, it is necessary to fulfill the following requirements: reliability - that the test will show the same results repeatedly in similar conditions, and validity - that the test detects and measures the level of assimilation of exactly the knowledge that the teacher wants to test. The advantage of tests is that they can include questions of various levels, and the simplicity of processing the results., And also the possibility of subjective assessment of the student's knowledge disappears. At the same time, several more requirements should be presented to the test itself. This is a clear wording of questions, really verified unambiguous answers that fall into one category by their nature can be used in the control of knowledge as a separately passed topic, a section of the final control. When assessing the correctness of the answers and the tasks themselves, the level of difficulty of the questions should be taken into account, which are distinguished by 3:

reproductive level 1 - questions that require an unambiguous answer or an unambiguous answer, or a simple reproduction of already passed material

Algorithm work Level 2 - the application of the knowledge gained when solving the question posed according to the already known algorithm of actions.

Creative level 3 - independently search, the use of previously acquired knowledge in solving non-algorithmized tasks using knowledge not only in the studied section and topic, but also in other subjects, the ability to establish cause-and-effect relationships, patterns.

Abstract, a feature of this type of work is that the student partially performs search work when working with several primary sources, highlighting the main generalization of the materials under study, the use of already acquired knowledge when covering this issue, the advantage is that as a result of independent work, the chosen topic for the abstract. Often, an abstract is confused with messages on the topic, despite the fact that rather stringent requirements are imposed on them, which are as follows, for school essays the volume of the student's own conclusions and conclusions. The analysis of the question to be disclosed should be at least 20% of the total volume of the abstract, when writing the abstract, they should use primary sources that are not textbooks, teaching / methodological manuals, in the worst case, this is popular science literature. However, when checking abstracts, the difficulty is that the teacher, in principle, must know almost all the literature that can be used when writing an abstract. As a rule, an abstract is a work that must meet the 3rd difficulty level.

The criteria for evaluating work in all literature when checking the quality of students' knowledge is based on the following criteria.

5 - fully proficient, posed subject to solving problems of all levels of complexity and receiving over 80% reliable (correct)

information in the presence of tasks of all levels or 95% when completing tasks of level 1, respectively, the percentage of correct answers will change from the complexity of the tasks in the presence of tasks of 1 and 2 levels, the number of correct answers, respectively, will be from 87 to 90%

provided that in the tasks containing three levels the ratio of the levels is 50:30:20, the first and second levels are 60/65: 40/35, with an oral questioning the answer is exhaustive and does not require any additions or clarifications from the teacher

4 - owns enough, is posed subject to solving problems of 1 and 2 levels in a three-level task and receiving from 65 to 70% of correct information or 75% when solving problems of 1 level, with oral questioning, the answer contains small omissions that are restored by students with leading questions teachers in small numbers.

3- does not know enough, is put on the condition that the tasks of the first level in multi-level tasks are solved in the amount of at least 75% or with 505 correct answers to the questions of a single-level task. An oral answer contains factual errors, which are corrected with additional questions from the teacher, the answer is incomplete, an illogical construction of the answer, an unrelated story, a weak monologue, an answer with the help of a teacher.

used in assessing the level of training of students.

Knowledge is tested and assessed in the course of the current classes, either orally or in writing. Written work is carried out on significant issues of the topic or section of the OBZH course. Control written work is carried out after studying the sections of the OBZH course program at the end of the quarter and the academic year. In the OBZh course, a credit test of knowledge can be used.

Teaching life safety, like other subjects, provides for individual - thematic control of students' knowledge. Moreover, when checking the level of mastering the material on each sufficiently large topic, it is mandatory to evaluate two main elements: theoretical knowledge and the ability to apply them when choosing practical ones.

To control the knowledge of life safety, various types of work are used (tests, express polls, independent, verification, control, practical, situational tasks).

Criteria for evaluation

Assessment of students' oral responses.

Rating "5" posed in the event that the student shows a correct understanding of the issues under consideration, gives precise formulations and interpretation of basic concepts, builds an answer according to his own plan, accompanies the story with examples, knows how to apply knowledge in a new situation when performing practical tasks; can establish a connection between the studied and previously studied material in the course of life safety, as well as with the material learned in the study of other subjects.

Rating "4" is posed if the student's answer meets the basic requirements for the answer to the mark "5", but is given without using his own plan, new examples, without applying knowledge in a new situation, without using connections with previously studied material and material learned in the study of other subjects; if the student made one mistake or no more than two shortcomings and can correct them on their own or with a little help from the teacher.

Rating "3" is posed if the student correctly understands the essence of the question in question, but the answer contains separate gaps in the assimilation of the questions of the OBZH course, which do not interfere with the further assimilation of the program material; knows how to apply the knowledge gained when solving simple problems using stereotyped solutions, but finds it difficult to solve problems that require deeper approaches in assessing phenomena and events; made no more than one gross error and two shortcomings, not more than one gross and one non-gross error, no more than two or three non-gross errors, one non-gross error and three shortcomings; made four or five faults.

Rating "2" is put if the student has not mastered the basic knowledge and skills in accordance with the requirements of the program and made more mistakes and shortcomings than necessary for grade 3.

When assessing the oral answers of students, it is advisable to conduct an element-by-element analysis of the answer based on the program requirements for the basic knowledge and skills of students, as well as the structural elements of some types of knowledge and skills, the assimilation of which should be considered mandatory learning outcomes.

Evaluation of written tests.

Rating "5" is awarded for work done completely without errors and shortcomings.

Rating "4" is awarded for a work completed in full, but if it contains no more than one blunder and one defect, no more than three defects.

Rating "3" is posed if the student correctly completed at least 2/3 of the entire work or made no more than one gross error and two shortcomings, no more than one gross and one non-gross error, no more than three non-gross errors, one non-gross error and three shortcomings, in the presence of four five shortcomings.

Rating "2" is put if the number of errors and shortcomings exceeded the norm for grade 3 or less than 2/3 of the entire work was done correctly.

Evaluation of practical work.

Rating "5" is put if the student performs practical work in full, observing the required sequence of actions, independently and correctly chooses the necessary equipment; conducts all techniques in conditions and modes that ensure the receipt of correct results and conclusions; complies with the requirements of safety regulations.

Rating "4" is set if the requirements for grade 5 are met, but two or three shortcomings were made, no more than one blunder and one defect.

Rating "3" set if the work is not completed completely, but the volume of the completed part is such that it allows you to get the correct result and conclusion; if mistakes were made during the reception.

Rating "2" is set if the work is not completed in full and the volume of the completed part of the work does not allow making the correct conclusions; if the techniques were performed incorrectly.

In all cases, the score is reduced if the student did not follow the safety rules.

Control and measuring materials are compiled in accordance with the requirements of the state standard for life safety, the level of training of students. Verification works consist of questions and tasks that meet the requirements of the basic level, both in volume and depth.

Fill out an application on our website

To fill out an application for the production of a document, you will need to fill out an order form on our website or download a questionnaire (located in the header of the website), fill it out and send the completed one to us by e-mail: [email protected] We ask you to be very careful when filling out the order form. If you have any questions during registration, please do not fill in these lines in the form. Our managers will call you back and help you to do this by phone.

Contact the manager to clarify all the details

Having received an application from you for the production of a document, our manager contacts you, checks the correctness of filling in all the specified data in the questionnaire and clarifies all the details for your order. He also gives full qualified advice on all issues that have arisen when placing an order.

Making a "mock-up" of a document for approval

Within a few days (usually about 1-2 days, depending on the quality of the form you have chosen), we make a so-called "model" of your diploma, certificate or any other document. This will be a fully completed document in electronic form, with all your data, grades in subjects, the topic of your thesis or graduation work in the etc. At this stage, you must check all the completed data and approve the "layout" for the manufacture of the original document. If you want to make any adjustments (improve or worsen grades in subjects, change the title of your thesis or graduation work, etc.). You say this over the phone to the manager leading you or write all your wishes or changes by e-mail in writing.

Complete document readiness

After the approval of the "layout", the complete readiness of the document usually takes 2-4 days for real Goznak forms and 1-2 days for the forms on the Typographic copy. When your document is completely ready, we will take a photo, video, or under an ultraviolet lamp (relevant for real forms from the Goznak factory) so that you can clearly see the complete readiness and authenticity of your document remotely. Next, we begin to negotiate a delivery method suitable for you.

Document delivery

In a number of large cities of Russia, we have representatives of our company, who themselves will deliver the finished document to a place convenient for you, and in a calm atmosphere you can check it again and make sure of its quality. After that, make a payment. This option is also good because the courier of our company, to meet with the client, can take with him a lamp with ultraviolet radiation, so that you can once again be fully convinced of the originality and quality of your document (when ordering this GOENAK form). A good printing house has never been passed off as a real Goznak. We send the document to cities and towns where there are no our representative offices using courier services by cash on delivery (DHL, Pony Express, EMS). Payment takes place upon receipt of the document.