According to the testimony of childhood friends, Anton wanted to become a military man while still in school. Prudent parents decided: the desire is commendable, but first try - whether you can handle military service. After school, Anton went to the army (1984), and after demobilization, he entered the Higher Naval School named after M.V. Frunze, which he graduated with honors in 1989.However, the ambitious young man did not have time to gain fame in the military field: along with the collapse of the USSR, the army began to fall apart, so in the memorable 1991 Kulbachevsky considered it best to go into business.

Five years later, he changes his business career to a scientific one: in 1996-2003. works as a researcher at the Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry named after V.I. Vernadsky, and from there he goes to public service. In 2003, he became an advisor to the chairman of the State Committee for Fisheries of the Russian Federation.

The next round is also not easy to explain: in 2005-2006. he holds the position of an economic security specialist at OAO Irkutskgazprom. And here again his career took an unexpected turn: Kulbachevsky switched from economic security to environmental, moving to the Federal Service for Supervision of Natural Resources (Rosprirodnadzor), to the department responsible for the Central Federal District (CFD).

Kulbachevsky's career in this department was more than successful: from the chief specialist (2006) to the head of the department of state control and supervision of forests and specially protected natural areas, then the deputy head of the Rosprirodnadzor department in the Central Federal District (2007) and a year later - his chapter.

Then everything is according to Chekhov: to Moscow, to Moscow! In November 2010, Kulbachevsky became the head of the Department of Nature Management and Environmental Protection of the Moscow Government. Many scandals of varying degrees of brightness and intensity are associated with the activities of Kulbachevsky in this post, primarily related to the so-called green zones of the capital, which have the status of protected areas, and at the same time are of particular interest to business, such as the long-suffering Bitsevsky Park and the Losiny Ostrov National Park ".

Urban waste is another sore problem of the department headed by Kulbachevsky. He is an ardent supporter of a very difficult plan to create eco-technology parks within a radius of 200 km from Moscow, where the capital's waste should be transported by rail.

According to some reports, he is currently a student at the Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation with a degree in State and Municipal Management, deepening his knowledge in the specialization "Ecology and Environmental Management".

State Counselor of the Russian Federation, 3rd class.

He was awarded the honorary badge of the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Environment of the Russian Federation "For Distinction in Service", a certificate of honor from Rosprirodnadzor, a commemorative breastplate "100 years since the birth of Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union NG Kuznetsov."

V. KARPOV: 15 hours 5 minutes, Vladimir Karpov is at the microphone, the program "Clever Guys" is on air. With us today is Anton Kulbachevsky, head of the Moscow Department of Nature Management and Environmental Protection. Hello, Anton Olegovich.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Hello.

V. KARPOV: What is happening with the Mosecomonitoring website? Already "Greenpeace”Writes letters to the mayor demanding to understand. The site has been closed since September; conservationists are already suggesting that you are deliberately hiding something.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Well, this is absolutely not the case. I think there is no need for extra PR of some kind "Greenpeace"Do, because this topic was discussed not only with"Greenpeace". And now it may turn out as a result that we closed the site for, let's say, reasons that ... There was a social request, ordinary people, let's say, could not adequately perceive the information that was posted on this site. The site was created in pilot mode in 2006 and, of course, it was mainly aimed at professionals. And we came across when the general interest, let's say, among Muscovites in this topic increased due to certain challenges, people called and complained that they could not figure out what the situation was, what indicators existed ...

V. KARPOV: Where it is good and where it is bad.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: No, just for a professional, for example, to look at the schedule, he will understand everything, but a layman can confuse something, something can scare him. There were, among other things, publications in the media, when journalists, again, took information from our site and drew the wrong conclusions, and there were many such cases. And, among other things, there was a social request, that is, since 2012, the department's reporting board, that is, we are holding it in March, constantly social activists raised the question that the site needs to be redone, it is necessary to make it more friendly. Well, then we must not forget that now all Moscow resources are being transferred to a single resource.mos. ru, therefore, in connection with this, among other things, it was planned, money was allocated for the modernization of the site, which is now ending, and regardless of the appeal "Greenpeace»This topic will in any case be opened in mid-February, we will present it at a special press conference, where we will tell you how to use this site.

V. KARPOV: That is, they were going to launch this website in December, now February has already begun, and its official presentation will take place in mid-February?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: I want to say that here, again, some public organizations distort the information, because the failure to provide information from the site does not mean that environmental monitoring does not work, because our critics often draw such conclusions, they are completely wrong. Eco-monitoring works in a full-fledged mode, we just provide information not on an hourly basis, but once every 4 hours, in principle there is nothing reprehensible in this.

V. KARPOV: I just noticed that on the mayor's website information bulletins are issued just three times a day from the Department of Natural Resources.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Therefore, we are not deceiving anyone, we are not hiding anything, we provide information at any request from residents.

V. KARPOV: And can you tell us a little more about monitoring and our bright future? It's just that Roshydromet, the Moscow Government, the Ministry of Emergency Situations announced the creation of a system for forecasting extreme natural events, here and you there is a link that you even considered the damage from these unpredictable phenomena that happened. What's going on with this? What do you want to do in the end?

А. a different situation, probably so. In this regard, of course, it is required to create this model, which could, in real time, in 3-4 hours at least give us a more accurate forecast of how this or that natural phenomenon will spread throughout the city.

Let me explain what this is connected with. If we take an ordinary area, not urbanized, not highly urbanized, then, in principle, Hydromet makes fairly accurate forecasts. But as soon as, let's say, a hurricane bursts into the city's territory, which already happened, let's say, last year in May and summer, we had two hurricanes (May and June), which, in principle, caused serious damage to the city economy, including the number of people suffered ... Here the forecast was much, let's say, less than the real effect.

V. KARPOV: That is, high-rise buildings have an effect, their air flows appear instantly. Do you propose to deal with this somehow or what?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: We propose to improve it, because you just need to calculate, let's say, in more mathematical models; people who are connected with mathematics understand this. These are probabilistic models, that is, the wind went there, what will happen, the wind went here, what will happen in a nutshell. Therefore, a serious, let's say, amount of memory is required in order to process all these models. So far, neither Hydromet, nor we have such capacities, I would say, in order to calculate these mathematical problems.

V. KARPOV: At Moscow State University, the computer "Lomonosov", if only for them, I do not know. Or are you going to put your own information center?

А. the science.

V. KARPOV: I understand. But additional monitoring stations still have to appear in the capital, as far as I understand.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Yes, of course, monitoring stations will also appear. But I say again that the most important thing is that there must be a serious computer that will process a large number of mathematical models in real time.

V. KARPOV: That is, accordingly, risk zones should appear on the map of Moscow if the wind blows from the north, from the west, at certain wind speeds and so on.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Of course. We will already give more precise recommendations to our residents, we will understand how, for example, if a hurricane comes from the west, you are absolutely right, which streets it will go, where there will be the most serious peak of the wind, for example, where it can be intensified due to architectural development, by taking into account various data again. That is, this is such a serious scientific work, I would say so.

V. KARPOV: Listen, such an analysis can lead to such large-scale consequences, because the requirements for buildings and for planting trees, green spaces and everything else can change. Is this all, as it were, also assumed within the framework of this project?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Well, of course, all this, let's say, follows one from the other. Now we do not take this into account yet, because, probably, we do not have such forecasts; as soon as they appear, of course, we will be forced - not even forced, but in any case we will simply take this into account.

V. KARPOV: When is it planned to complete this work?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: I think that sometime next year, in 2019, in the middle of 2019, it will already be possible to talk about some, perhaps, pilot launches of this system.

V. KARPOV: Let's talk about something more pleasant, not only about natural disasters, but also about such large-scale projects. "A million trees" - so, as I understand it, the project is called?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Yes, “Million Trees” is an action that the mayor announced in 2013 in August. It is recognized to increase the quality and quantity of green spaces - these are mainly trees and shrubs - in Moscow courtyards.

V. KARPOV: This action will take place for 5 years now. And what, half a million has already been planted there?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: We have already crossed over 2 million trees and bushes and, in principle, are moving on. I think that in 5 years we have greened about 30% of Moscow courtyards in Old Moscow somewhere.

V. KARPOV: Do I understand correctly that the greening needs to be brought to 100%?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Well, I would like to. The action, in principle, is designed to come to every Moscow courtyard within 10 years, annoy something, improve something.

V. KARPOV: Remove poplars, plant chestnuts instead, or something ...

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Moreover, it is necessary to take into account the opinion of residents, because this program is not initiative, that is, it is not an initiative of the Moscow Government, the initiative comes directly from the residents of each courtyard in this sense.

V. KARPOV: Any additional requirements this year will appear for those plantings that are being made?

А.

V. KARPOV: When will the last poplar be exterminated in Moscow? Is there such a plan at all?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: You know, I think, never, because poplar is one of the most productive and effective environmental filters from an environmental point of view.

V. KARPOV: And the most dangerous ones.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Another question is that you just need to choose the right breeds, now there are such breeds that do not push, so a replacement will just gradually take place, which, in principle, is happening.

V. KARPOV: That is, the poplars will remain, but they will simply be of a different breed. Good.

Another interesting piece of information that was in the news was that there is now some incredible number of wild foxes in Moscow, which appear in the center of Moscow as well. What's happening?

А. The second is that the city is gradually being cleared of ownerless animals (cats, dogs), that is, certain work is being carried out, including by the veterinary service, Rospotrebnadzor, prefectures of administrative districts directly to solve this problem. This includes fewer rats. And here, in this sense, a fodder base appears and it must be filled by someone, these are mainly, of course, our waste storage sites, let's put it mildly. Well, in nature, as it were, if there is a food base, then some species in any case fills this vacuum. Now it turns out that raccoon dogs and foxes directly change just traditional stray dogs and cats.

Now this process is taking place, and in principle, there is probably nothing so surprising in this, foxes live in London and in other European cities. Here it is simply necessary, it seems to me, to develop a culture of interaction in an urban environment between representatives of wildlife, wild flora and fauna and the inhabitants of the city. In this sense, we have been seriously engaged in this for 7 years now, we are conducting scientific and educational work, that is, we are telling through all channels, ringing the bells and explaining to people what can be done and what not, we give recommendations.

V. KARPOV: But does it make you happy or does it cause some concern? Because no one vaccinates wild foxes for sure, which means that they can be carriers of rabies and whatever you want.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Now, in fact, we are already vaccinating them, that is, we have such programs together with the Veterinary Committee. It is clear that they are not vaccinated in laboratories, because not everyone is caught, but with the help of food, special preparations, let's say, are scattered with food in certain places and also become prey for foxes and raccoon dogs, and thus they are vaccinated - probably , in simple language it can be explained this way.

V. KARPOV: Curious. Just when you teach interaction, what to do when we see a wild fox? - to deliver a camera and take pictures or call somewhere?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: First of all, you need to understand that a representative of the wild, be it a hare, be it a person, a wild boar, an elk ... We also have such inhabitants in our specially protected natural areas within the boundaries of Old Moscow. With moose, there are a lot of cases when people also believe that if a moose is in the city, then it must be tame, you can talk to it, come up to it. The moose is very frightened by the person and therefore can behave inappropriately, there are a lot of accidents. That is, practically the contact of a person with a moose ends for a person with some kind of trauma, there are such cases every year, they are known and all are described, including in the press.

The main thing, probably, is still to understand that this is not a dog or a cat, he will not come up to you, he has a completely different attitude towards a person; basically they avoid communicating with a person, and here, of course, it is by no means imposing to impose, because this can lead to contact, that is, to a bite, and a bite is already, you are absolutely right ...

V. KARPOV: This is already a problem.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: This is already a danger, it will be necessary to find out whether the animal is infected or not, but in any case, no one, as a rule, knows this; if the animal is not caught, then it will be necessary to undergo, let's say, a serious medical impact in the form of injections and everything else.

V. KARPOV: Unpleasant.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Yes.

V. KARPOV: That is, even now these animals are becoming more and more. When will this cause you a certain alertness, will I formulate it like this? That is, now you do not seem to interfere with their reproduction, because they have a food base and in general ...

А. this is one of the measures to deal directly with these consequences. That is, if there is no food, there will be no more individuals, because in nature they reproduce very clearly, depending on the food base.

V. KARPOV: Do you plan to deliberately feed them in parks, in nature reserves?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: We do not plan and do not recommend our residents to be compassionate, because many people believe that the fox, she is so poor, has entered the city, it must be fed. This is what I would not recommend doing: as soon as there is, firstly, dependence on humans, that is, an animal loses all its instincts, it cannot survive on its own in nature.

V. KARPOV: We talked about wild animals, a little about exotic ones. Even when we met last year, then we just started talking about the bill on exotic animals that live on the territory of Moscow. What's with this bill now?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Now this bill is almost ready in the first reading, in order to be heard in the Moscow City Duma, while my plan is probably not drawn up, I do not clearly understand when this will happen, in March or in April, literally in the near future time. Now I'm afraid to name some dates again, so that later they would not accuse me of saying that the site will open before the New Year, and it opened in February. For us, a month and a half is not of principle, because there are certain difficulties now.

V. KARPOV: Is he in the Moscow City Duma now in fact?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Yes, now he is in the Moscow City Duma. In principle, I think that in 2018 it will be heard at least in the first, second and third readings. Whether it is adopted or not, some amendments and changes will be made to it - I admit such a thought, because the topic itself excites the minds of both Muscovites and social activists; The crowdsourcing project that we carried out last year showed this, and this topic aroused great interest in itself. And I, probably, as a person and a specialist who has been doing this in the city for a long time and successfully, I think that without this law, it’s easy to continue ...

V. KARPOV: What exactly do you propose? It's just that not everyone has read this bill, few have read it, I will say so.

А. who are in care, and there were three wild cats.

V. KARPOV: Yes.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: A scandal erupted, a complaint came to our department, we even went out with the police and watched. It seemed to be a concrete example. We arrived, the documents for these wild cats seem to be in order at first glance, those that are now required by law.

V. KARPOV: And what are they? - Maine Coon, jungle cat?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: No, there are lions and a leopard.

V. KARPOV: Oh, kitties, good, accepted.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: The cats are wild, yes. Here's an example: it turns out that a small child lives, again, who is under care, but here, excuse me, three representatives, almost wild cats, dangerous, rather predatory. And here, naturally, the guardianship authorities have a question about how this happens. Now, if the law was adopted in Moscow, then for each such wild cat, conditions of detention would be prescribed. That is, if you want to have a lion or a tiger, we do not forbid you, please, but make the conditions of detention that will be prescribed by law so that the animal does not suffer or suffer less from the fact that it is in captivity.

V. KARPOV: That is, it will hardly be possible to keep such a kitty in the apartment instantly, I guess.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Either there should be an apartment of 200 square meters, for example, then, probably, 100 square meters can be allocated for wild cats.

V. KARPOV: As an aviary.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Create conditions, I say again, we will prescribe them. We will have conditions of detention for almost all species of animals that are kept in Moscow and in the world's megacities in general, which are in demand among residents of megacities. We will strictly forbid keeping some animals.

V. KARPOV: Which ones? - poisonous?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Poisonous snakes, which are in fact undoubtedly dangerous, let's say, for human life, you probably don't need to contact them, especially in urban conditions.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Exotics, in general, the definition of exotic animals is those animals that do not live on the territory of the Russian Federation, that is, they were brought from other regions, from other continents, this is exotic.

V. KARPOV: That is, if I keep a domestic fox, then, in principle, it is no longer quite exotic?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: This is a hunting species. That is, in our country, animals are also divided, there are different gradations in different legislation.

V. KARPOV: But everything will be spelled out, what am I trying to understand?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: At least for representatives of wild flora and fauna, yes. But now we take domestic animals, we do not take farm animals, we take only hunting species that, let's say, live in our country, representatives of wildlife and naturally exotics that are brought from various regions of the Earth, that is, this is both Africa and Latin America, and Southeast Asia.

V. KARPOV: In case of non-observance of the rules and regulations, what? - to withdraw?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Well, yes, we will confiscate them. That is, in the beginning, in addition to the fact that we prescribed the conditions for almost all types of animals, the second part is still permissive documentation, that is, you must definitely notify us that you have purchased this or that animal. We keep records, we can, in case, let's say, some need to check ...

V. KARPOV: Do you need to pay for this? Do you need any licenses, certificates?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: No, this will not be a paid topic, but in any case, we need to keep a record of animals, because all our cases and experience show that without taking into account we do not clearly understand where it is located in our country, and we cannot prevent it this way. or else the threat is probably so.

V. KARPOV: There are a lot of questions from our listeners on this topic. "Birds of prey will be in the law?" - Vlad is interested.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Yes, they will.

V. KARPOV: "Is a lynx also suitable?", "Exotic ostriches, if they were born already in Russia?" Are they exotic animals or not? Let’s do this, I will now address the audience separately: I will try to ask all your questions towards the end of our program. Let me remind you that Anton Kulbachevsky, the head of the Department of Nature Management and Environmental Protection of Moscow, is with us today. We will connect you a little later and even then I will try to ask the maximum number of questions, including receiving phone calls. Now let's just go over the issues that still remain.

Have we eliminated an unauthorized dump in Pechatniki?

А. they dropped it there, and it turned out that somewhere in 2014 this topic was already, let's say ...

V. KARPOV:… it became obvious.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Yes, it became obvious, and it had to be solved. This decision was made, and yesterday Sergei Semenovich Sobyanin already visited this object, and stated the fact that the work has already been practically completed, in April the work on the rehabilitation of the territory will end, that is, the territory will be rehabilitated, there is already no harmful effect on Moscow. the river, neither on residential buildings, nor on the atmospheric air, it will not. Well, in the future, a technical sports park will be created there, there is historically such a place that people again unauthorizedly engaged in motocross and go-karting.

V. KARPOV: So you will try to cultivate this whole thing?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Yes, we will cultivate, because there is a social request from the residents of the district as well. It will be such a family recreation park, including technical sports.

V. KARPOV: Will a track be built there for racers, for motorcycle racers?

А.

V. KARPOV: I don't really like official events, but you have to attend them. I draw your attention to the fact that in Paris at the end of January, at the very end of January, the first meeting of representatives of the cities-participants of "Urban 20" was held - this is an event where you agreed about something with representatives of other million-plus cities on the planet Earth. What did you agree on? In the end, what were you going to do?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Basically, the first meeting was so informative, that is, we decided on our plans. In fact, the 20 largest megalopolises in the world, I would say even urban agglomerations, have united in a united effort to ... There is such an international organizationG20, which includes 20 countries. There was an opinion that not always, let's say, the wishes of cities at this level are heard and taken into account, so we discussed three topics: climate change, that is, how to directly adapt cities to climate change. The topic is well known, we have been discussing it for a long time, so we agreed that we will ask, let's say, the governments of the countries that will take part in the meeting, which will be held in Buenos Aires in October, in order to come up with their proposals. Many more European cities are already concerned with the problem of migration, a lot of migrants have now merged directly into city life, there are problems, of course, they need to be adapted both socially and culturally ...

V. KARPOV: Are you trying to create some unified rules for all million-plus cities on Earth?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: In fact, we have been exchanging experience with large cities for a long time, we have such an associationC40, which mainly unites 40 large metropolitan areas since 2006, and Moscow was also a pioneer in this organization. That is, New York, London, Paris, Moscow at that moment entered this organization, we actively participate in it. She mainly deals with climate change. Here is the agendaG20 is probably broader than the climate only, including ecology, environmental issues, social issues, issues of public spaces, information technology, and all other issues. We worked out a solution on just two issues, the climate and the direct adaptation of people.

V. KARPOV: Let me remind you that Anton Kulbachevsky, head of the Moscow Department of Nature Management and Environmental Protection, is with us. Now we will part for the time of the news release, after that we will come back and continue.

NEWS

V. KARPOV: 3:35 p.m., the program "Clever Guys" is on air, Vladimir Karpov is at the microphone. With us today is Anton Kulbachevsky, head of the Moscow Department of Nature Management and Environmental Protection. We will soon move on to the questions of our listeners.

The only thing that, in my opinion, did not talk about is about the spring planting of trees, which should begin. In general, we talked about the fact that yes, we are continuing the Million Trees program, but there was no specific information about the spring plantings as such. What are you planning?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: During spring planting ... Firstly, we have a month of landscaping in April, trees are planted there, again, all residents gather in a single impulse, clean the city after the winter period, trees are planted in different areas of the city ... Well, in general, the main programs according to which trees will be planted this year is a program of compensatory landscaping, this is when trees are lost in the course of urban planning activities and are planted, as a rule, in double size, that is, 2 times more, in the same area ... This is the Million Trees program, which is designed to again increase the quality and quantity of green spaces in Moscow courtyards, there will be a spring campaign, it is usually timed to coincide with Victory Day, planting takes place in early May.

V. KARPOV: If someone, let's say, has an idea of ​​what needs to be changed in the yard, is this where to go, is this where to write?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: You can apply to the Our City portal, you can submit an application on the website of the administration, on the website of our department, and within two weeks a decision will be made about which trees will be planted. The only, let's say, nuance here, probably because of what there is a delay - we need to agree with Mosgeotrest the landing site in order to avoid planting trees on communications. Often, residents do not know how communications go in the courtyard, which is not surprising, and for example, it seems to them that there is no greenery here, because someone missed something.

V. KARPOV: Here it is a bald flower bed, why nothing grows there.

А. There is also a provision that trees cannot be planted 5 meters from the blind area of ​​buildings and structures, because the same story, the roots can damage the foundation of the building directly. These are probably the two restrictions on which in any case we are forced to consider all applications together with Geotrest in order to make a decision.

V. KARPOV: That is, if we get together in the yard and decide that we need to annoy the trees, then it is useless to go somewhere in the nearest forest in order to dig some seedlings there and try to stick it in our yard in the spring, and it is better to write to you, because you are going to make this decision, moreover, will you provide these seedlings?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: We will provide both seedlings and various, again, trench material, so-called, we present shovels, everything, everything, everything, and we plant it together with the residents. We have developed a direct guide - these are 80 trees and shrubs, which we recommend for planting in Moscow. Residents look at this booklet, choose, there are all the photos, there are all the properties of plants, including the mode of caring for them. But the most important thing is that the authorities and residents in this sense in a single impulse plant greenery in the courtyard, in the future the residents, having already planted trees together with us, take care of them, that is, they begin to follow them. As a rule, the greens that were planted under the Million Trees program take root very well, because residents are already beginning, let's say, to take care of their own.

V. KARPOV: Do you monitor the trees that were planted in November-December?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: We now have this obligation included, let's say, already in the contractual obligations of the contractor, during the year the contractor monitors the survival rate of green spaces, there is a 3-year guarantee. Already after a year after it is believed that the plant has taken root, it is then transferred to the balance of the organization that contains the entire territory.

V. KARPOV: That is, if something sticky on Tverskaya is bent, then it is the contractor's duty to replace it at his own expense, because it is spelled out in the contract?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Well, we are not talking about Tverskaya at all now, because this is the Million Trees program, there is a three-year guarantee. If under the Million Trees program, let's say, less valuable trees are planted, so there is quite enough year to understand whether a tree has taken root or not, but under the Million Trees program there is a three-year guarantee.

V. KARPOV: Good. I will remind the listeners that Anton Kulbachevsky, the head of the Department of Nature Management and Environmental Protection, is with us. Once again I will read in large letters: Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection. I draw your attention to this unless you are asked different questions, including those related to transport, so I will try to filter them out.

Let's do it this way. Oleg writes: “About 2 years ago, high poplars were cut down on the boulevard along Dobrolyubov Street, nothing was planted in their place. Why didn't you compensate for the damage to the ecology of the city? " And there are plenty of such questions, I just took one as an example. How to act in such a situation?

А. not only in Moscow courtyards, trees are being lost, and just "Hole in Hole", that is, the old tree is removed and a new one is planted. Therefore, it is enough, in principle, to send an application to the website of our department, we will make a decision and include these addresses, these plantings for this fall.

V. KARPOV: Vlad asks: “Will there be places for practicing with hunting birds? In general, what can the guest tell about the development of falconry in Moscow? "

A. KULBACHEVSKY: We have quite a few falcon centers in Moscow as such. If the All-Russian Research Institute of Nature is in the Northern Butovo region, there is, let's say, a falcon center, but it is mainly engaged, probably, in reproducing the population, that is, breeding, but by no means hunting. But there are, of course, falcon clubs. To say that they need some territories, I have been working for at least 7 years, no one has addressed me with such a request; if they do, then, in principle, this issue can be worked out. I think that on the territory of New Moscow you can find some territories where ...

V. KARPOV: That is, if in Pechatniki, at the site of an unauthorized dump, they found a place for racing tracks, then why not find a place for falconry somewhere in Krylatskoye, for example?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Falconry still implies hunting itself, which means there must be an animal.

V. KARPOV: Well, there are foxes already, you said yourself, raccoon dogs.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Hunting in our city is prohibited, but it is quite possible to place a falcon center, there are still such territories.

V. KARPOV: “In Pokrovsky-Streshnevo I saw peeled trees, young maples were scalped. I reported to the police. Why do they even rip off trees and how do you fight duvarii? "

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Duvarii?

V. KARPOV: Yes. No, nothing, no way? In general, there is such vandalism in relation to trees?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Well, for sure there is, if a radio listener addresses us. Let's check this information, I'll take my homework, I will definitely answer what happened to these maples. We just have a program for the removal of introduced species, that is, these are the plants ...

V. KARPOV: With the savages, he just explains.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: ... which are unusual for the average Russian zone. Canadian maple, for example, is a plant that migrated to us from North America, it is an introduced species and, among other things, clogs, let's say, those species that are traditional for our strip.

V. KARPOV: Plus to everything else, are they fighting with us?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: We need to look at which maples.

V. KARPOV: I understand, it is accepted.

Sergei writes: “A good friend of mine worked as an inspector in the nature conservation area for the forest, left because of low salaries, 4 years ago about 18-20 thousand in Moscow. How can you cut off the corruption component during inspections with such a salary of ordinary employees? "

А. Of course, it's quite, let's say, hard to exist on that kind of money, but I would not say that we have some kind of strong corruption in the forestry sector, that is, these manifestations ...

V. KARPOV: At least on the territory of Moscow.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: It is practically absent on the territory of Moscow. It is clear that there are some isolated cases, but the family, as they say, is not without its black sheep, people are different in any case.

V. KARPOV: Glebozavrik: “I live in Lyubertsy, Krasnaya Gorka. Trees are catastrophically small. " Where to?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: In Lyubertsy?

V. KARPOV: To colleagues?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Contact my colleague Alexander Kogan, he will help.

V. KARPOV: Okay, good. Let's take a phone call. 73-73-94-8, listening to you. Hello, hello.

V. KARPOV: Yes, good. Are you on the air, please.

LISTENER: Can I ask Anton Olegovich a question?

V. KARPOV: You are already asking it. What is your name?

LISTENER: Hello. My name is Dmitry Yuryevich Legoshin, Anton Olegovich and I have known each other for about a year, approximately from the situation on the Krylatsky hills. I would like to ask the following question. More than 20 thousand residents signed a petition to prevent landscaping in the Krylatsky Hills. Why has Anton Olegovich still not terminated the contract and pays no attention to almost more than 20 thousand votes of the residents of the Krylatskoye district? This is the first question.

And the second question. Before the New Year, the ecological community of Moscow in the Moscow City Duma voted for the resignation of Anton Olegovich from his post in connection with the catastrophic situation with the protected areas of Moscow. How does he relate to this fact? Thanks.

V. KARPOV: Accepted, thank you. Please.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: I will immediately answer the second question. I am not aware that someone voted for my resignation, this is news to me. But in any case, I am ready to discuss this issue, especially with the Moscow City Duma we are very actively discussing it.

Question number 2, why didn't I terminate the contract ...

V. KARPOV: There is a whole scandal around Krylatsky, as far as I understand.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Well, the scandal is actually more exaggerated, because no improvement was planned there, now this issue is not even discussed at all. And the contract ...

V. KARPOV: In short, I am rather familiar with this.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: This is actually a question of legal technology, that is, a contract can only be terminated by a court decision without the consent of the parties - this is probably the whole answer. That is, it is not done by magic or by my decision.

V. KARPOV: Just to make it clear to me. As far as I understand this conflict, ski slopes were built on the Krylatsky Hills, not everyone is happy with these ski slopes, the public is collecting signatures against this.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Not quite so.

V. KARPOV: How? Just explain.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: There was a scandal in the fact that it was planned to place Ethnomir directly - you know, there is such a park ...

V. KARPOV: Yes.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Yes, Ethnomir came up with an initiative, won a tender in order to place, let's say, its facilities there. After a serious conflict, a scandal, people did not want this, I agree that some of the residents of Krylatskoye did not want this, this was actually confirmed by the appeals of the residents, so this issue is now, let's say, being resolved. No final decisions have been made yet.

V. KARPOV: No decision has been made on Ethnomir?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Well, yes. Most likely, some alternative site will be selected, most likely, this project will be implemented simply in another place.

V. KARPOV: Is this the same project that is in the Borovsky District of the Kaluga Region?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Yes. It's not exactly the same, but the focus is, yes.

V. KARPOV: Let's make one more call. 73-73-94-8, we listen to you carefully. Yes, hello.

LISTENER: Hello, good afternoon.

V. KARPOV: Yes, you are on the air, please.

LISTENER: My name is Alexey. I'm calling on a question. I live in the Kozhukhovo microdistrict, we have an enterprise here, an incineration plant No. 4. We constantly write and call and complain that our environment is very sad here, and the same foxes come out of the forest ... Well, that's okay, this is all the second. We would like to find out why your guest does not respond to our calls and requests for constant air monitoring in our area.

V. KARPOV: Yes, thank you, it is accepted.

А. Another issue is that the incineration plant itself is subject to federal control and I have no right to carry out inspections on it. Checks are carried out by Rospotrebnadzor.

V. KARPOV: That is, the incineration plant in Kozhukhovo is not accountable to you?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Yes. Therefore, of course, we monitor the air, while we do not see any serious excess from the incineration plant, there are sensors on the pipes of this plant that transmit a signal in real time, let's say, at the power of eco-monitoring, and in any case, we, if there is any excess of hazardous substances, we see it in real time and can take action. That is, we turn to Rospotrebnadzor, Rosprirodnadzor and the environmental prosecutor's office, which conducts an inspection - this is probably our role at this stage. Therefore, I say again that for the time being, MSZ4, again, according to official data, according to research, does not have a serious harmful effect.

V. KARPOV: Is there any place for an incineration plant in Moscow?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: This is another question already. It all depends on the technology, in my opinion. If there are technologies, and they exist in the world now, to clean up emissions into the atmosphere, why not? We have examples when in the center of large European cities, I will not name them, so as not to promote themselves, there are incineration facilities, and there is nothing so terrible in this.

V. KARPOV: Elena Barshal writes: “Any mathematics can be explained on the fingers, and we, the listeners, are able to understand what is the difference between the old model and the new one,” - this brings us back to the conversation about ...

A. KULBACHEVSKY: About the site?

V. KARPOV: Not about the website, but about the monitoring of dangerous natural phenomena.

V. KARPOV: "What is the difference between the old model and the new one, if, of course, there is one at all?" In general, the old model, now there is some kind of model for monitoring such situations?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: It exists in Roshydromet. But I say again that there is no model for highly urbanized territories.

V. KARPOV: That is, it exists only for natural phenomena from a series of what the temperature will be, what the wind force will be, that's it, but the model sharpened for Moscow is currently only in development?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Not for a large urban agglomeration yet, yes.

V. KARPOV: One more call: 73-73-94-8, we are listening to you. Hello, hello.

LISTENER: Hello, hello. Can I ask a question?

V. KARPOV: Yes, you are already on the air and are asking it.

LISTENER: I have the following question. Dear Anton Olegovich, in the program you talked about planting trees. And how do you like the idea of ​​planting officials of your department, for example, under Article 358 of the Criminal Code for permitting the destruction by capital development of a natural complex of the only sports facility in the Losinoostrovsky District, the century-old Krasnaya Arrow stadium? In general, your employees work simply disgustingly, even the formal requirements for the consideration of citizens' appeals are not observed. I myself applied to your department several times about the destruction of trees by one of the parishes of the Russian Orthodox Church on unauthorized parts of the land plot in Dzhamgarovsky Park, but I didn’t receive an answer in essence, and the environmental prosecutor’s office recognized your answers as illegal. My name is Constantine.

V. KARPOV: Thank you, it's accepted.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Konstantin, now you are actually reading from a piece of paper, I don’t have any materials at hand. I suggest you not to download the air now - let's meet with you and I will answer all your questions, there are no questions.

V. KARPOV: If you want, I'll write his phone number.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Yes, of course.

V. KARPOV: Now, wait, it will take me some short time. Yeah, there is, everything, I wrote it down. Konstantin, your phone number is recorded, I will give it to Anton Olegovich.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: We will contact you right after the broadcast.

V. KARPOV: Let's make one more call: 73-73-94-8 - we are listening to you attentively, hello.

LISTENER: Yes, hello. Live, am I getting it right?

V. KARPOV: Yes, you are already on the air. What is your name?

LISTENER: Hello. My name is Daria, I would also like to ask a question. Being a resident of the city of Moscow, also the Kozhukhovo microdistrict, from where Alexei called, the previous question was about the incineration plant. For six months we had a disgusting situation with smells, it was revealed that it was "Kuchino". I am not an expert, but I can say that the smells are disgusting, almost every night we cannot open the windows and literally suffocate.

V. KARPOV: Still?

LISTENER: Yes, still. No further, I’ll even say, from the 30th to the 31st, it didn’t just smell, that is, it’s such a pungent smell, impossible, that through the double-glazed windows, whatever you like, that is, residents wake up for six months because at 5 in the morning ... These are always night smells, that is, it always happens only at night. We wake up at night terrified. Will it ever end?

V. KARPOV: Thank you.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: There is nothing surprising in why night smells arise. In fact, Moscow already has, let's say, its own microclimate, and at night movement, the movement of air masses occurs somewhat, let's say, according to different laws than during the day. But in fact, we mainly record complaints about unpleasant odors at night.

V. KARPOV: Night and morning hours.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Yes, because the dispersion conditions are much worse than, say, during the day, I will say so generally. The fact that there is actually a problem with odors from the remediation of the Kuchino landfill is not a secret for anyone, it is a generally recognized fact, and our colleagues from the Moscow Region, who are actively solving this problem, are also, let's say, trying to help. if we are asked for something, we, as a rule, respond to the requests of our colleagues, we help them in every possible way either with consulting or with some kind of power.

The most important thing here is to understand that literally in the near future (at least, as our colleagues from the Moscow Region promise us, this is March-April), some technological processes at the test site will be completed, some stages. The main idea here is to cover the landfill, let's say, with a certain film, so that these smells are not already exuded into the atmosphere. While this work is going on, smells will arise. I say it again ...

V. KARPOV: That is, until the end of reclamation ...

A. KULBACHEVSKY: No, let's just say, the stage that already removes odors, and reclamation can take place over several years, because the filtrate, landfill gases cannot be removed within a month or two.

V. KARPOV: March-April, did I hear correctly?

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Well, at least such terms are given to us by our colleagues. I say again that in this sense I do not have control of the situation, I do not reclaim, I am not the customer of work at this landfill.

V. KARPOV: “At night, factories release harmful impurities into the air, this is precisely what is connected with this. Is there any night monitoring? " - it simply does not trust your information that other movements of air masses at night and therefore assume that it is precisely at night that there are some large-scale emissions.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Well, at least in the Kozhukhovo area, other than the Kuchin landfill, sources of unpleasant odors have not yet been identified additionally.

V. KARPOV: Anton Kulbachevsky, head of the Department of Nature Management and Environmental Protection, was with us. I give you Konstantin's phone number, Anton Olegovich.

A. KULBACHEVSKY: Thank you.

V. KARPOV: Thank you for coming. Come again.

Anton Olegovich Kulbachevsky was born in 1967 in Moscow.

1984 to 1991 served in the armed forces of the USSR, during this time he entered and in 1989 graduated with honors from the Higher Naval School named after V.I. M.V. Frunze. In 2013, he received a second higher education at the Russian Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation with a degree in State and Municipal Administration, specialization in Ecology and Environmental Management.

From 1991 to 1996 worked in commercial structures, then came to the Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry. VI Vernadsky as a research associate of the laboratory of chemical sensors and determination of gas-forming impurities.

In 2003, he was appointed advisor to the chairman of the State Committee for Fisheries of the Russian Federation, in 2005 he worked as a specialist in economic security at OJSC Irkutskgazprom.

In 2006, he took up the post of chief specialist of the department of state control and supervision over forests and specially protected natural areas of the regional department of Rosprirodnadzor in the Central Federal District, and in 2007 was appointed head of the department - deputy head of the department of Rosprirodnadzor in the Central Federal District. 2008 to 2010 served as Head of the Department of Rosprirodnadzor for the Central Federal District.

Since November 10, 2010, he has headed the Department of Natural Resources Management and Environmental Protection of Moscow.

Anton Olegovich was awarded the badge of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation "Honorary Worker of Nature Protection", the badge of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation "Excellence in Environmental Protection" and the badge of honor of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation "For Excellence in Service".

The head of the department is fond of swimming, plays football, takes vocals, loves to read fiction.

“I love Moscow in all its diversity. But I especially like to walk in natural parks when I have free time. It's so nice to listen to birdsong, admire the flowers, communication with nature helps to recuperate, ”says Anton Kulbachevsky about his favorite pastime.

Two departments and other structures of the Moscow mayor's office were involved in the scandal associated with the likely embezzlement of 6 billion rubles from the capital's budget.

As it turned out, instead of taking care of the ecology of the city and looking after landfills, Moscow officials bought themselves apartments for budget money, opposition circles reported. According to preliminary data, Anton Kulbachevsky, head of the Department of Nature Management and Environmental Protection of the city of Moscow, may be involved in this scam.

Who "poisoned" the Moskva River?

It seems that soon the corruption scandals under Sergei Sobyanin will beat even theft of the Luzhkov period. But at the same time, if earlier they stole from the budget in millions, now - in billions. Judging by the report of the auditors of the Control and Accounts Chamber (KSP), now the environmental sector is under a special blow from the embezzlers, for which the head of the Department of Nature Management and Environmental Protection of the city of Moscow Anton Kulbachevsky is responsible in the capital.

So the auditors of the KSP found out that almost 6 billion rubles from the capital's budget allocated for the maintenance of the landfills went in an unknown direction. As it turned out, the construction work was either not carried out or was carried out with such violations that the refined (according to the papers) landfills even more actively polluted the environment. But why did Mr. Kulbachevsky not react to this in any way? Perhaps he has his own interest in this situation? !!

So, the bulk of the violations occurred at the "infamous" dump in the village of Salaryevo - one of the largest in the Moscow region. Earlier, Moscow environmentalists actively protested against it, but the Moscow authorities “did not notice” the public outrage.

So, as it turned out, in the process of eliminating this "garbage kingdom", it was planned to build a ski slope on the site of the landfill, and around low-rise ecological buildings for young modern families. However, young families are unlikely to want to live in this place.

Indeed, in fact, work on the improvement (and care of the landfill) was carried out here with huge violations. Moreover, in the end, all this led to an environmental disaster. After all, a black-brown, caustic, foul-smelling liquid with oily spots, which scientists call filtrate, has long since seeped from the landfill through many streams into the local river Setunka, the waters of which eventually end up in the Moscow River !!!

In fact, the actions of the officials led to the poisoning of the main aquifer of the city, but the head of the Department of Nature Management and Environmental Protection of the city of Moscow Anton Kulbachevsky "for some reason" remains stubbornly silent about the situation.

Have officials got new apartments instead of protecting the environment?

It is curious that huge funds were allocated for the reclamation of the landfill. So, for example, for 2012–2014, 283.3 million rubles were allocated for the reclamation of Salaryevo with its completion “according to the high-altitude scheme”. Moreover, the main part of the work was supposed to be completed last year (by the end of 2013, the bulk of the money - 253 million rubles - should have been spent on improving the landfill).

I wonder where all this money went, if the customer of the construction, the state unitary enterprise Mosekostroy, did not even carry out planned repairs in Salaryevo? !! As a result, the KSP stated that the “ineffective expenses” for the landfill reclamation amounted to 166 million rubles, or 65%.

Against this background, the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of Moscow reported that the environmental damage to the city eventually exceeded 3.8 billion rubles. If we add to this another 6 billion rubles "left to the left", then the total loss is almost 10 billion!

At the same time, officials “for some reason” included the cost of buying apartments in the estimate of the object's reclamation. So, in 2014, a total of 235 million rubles were allocated for the reclamation of the landfill, of which 56.8 million rubles, or 24%, were allocated for the purchase of apartments for their employees.

"Roof" from the city hall?

In other words, causing billions of dollars in damage to the urban ecology, officials not only "directly", i.e. according to the estimate, they bought themselves new apartments, but, most likely, they simply “sawed up” most of the funds on construction contracts!

Here, claims arise against the management of the Moscow City Overhaul Department, which includes GUP Mosekostroy, and against the head of the capital's environmental department, Mr. Kulbachevsky.

After all, it was the Department of Nature Management and Environmental Protection of the city of Moscow that was supposed to stop the ecological disaster in Salaryevo and prevent leachate from getting into the Moskva River. But this was not done! Is this negligence or corruption ?! After all, it is unlikely that Kulbachevsky so disinterestedly missed the end of the “ineffective waste” of 6 billion rubles. for environmental needs, which ultimately caused damage to the urban ecology by almost 4 billion rubles.

Agree that in this situation, the most likely version seems to be that Kulbachevsky could in one form or another receive "kickbacks" from the machinations in Salaryevo, thereby providing cover at the level of the mayor's office!

"Shadow" of Rosprirodnadzor, or business with the ministry's son?

Note that Anton Kulbachevsky, before working in the capital city hall, headed the Department of Rosprirodnadzor in the Central Federal District. But this department, in turn, was subordinate to the then head of the Ministry of Natural Resources Yuri Trutnev, who had previously been the governor of the Perm region (Trutnev has now been transferred to the Far East, but the leadership of Rosprirodnadzor has not changed - ed.)

Anton Kulbachevsky, during his time at the head of the environmental department of the capital, managed to spend more than 4 billion rubles from the Moscow budget for the purchase of deicing materials (PGM) produced by the Ural plant of deicing materials (UZPM). This plant belongs to Dmitry Trutnev, the son of ex-Minister of Natural Resources Yuri Trutnev

At one time, the enterprise was created with the aim of processing hazardous waste from the landfills of the Solikamsk magnesium plants into the PGM. Now it sells at exorbitant prices to Russian cities PGM based on dirty rock salt and recycled waste.

Who is poisoning Muscovites?

Now it is worth recalling that in April 2011, Anton Kulbachevsky and the head of the Department of Housing and Communal Services and Improvement (DZHKHiB) Andrei Tsybin held perhaps the most scandalous competition in the history of the capital for the purchase of PGM - all three winners of the competition submitted false guarantees. Note that, according to ecologists, these PGMs are hazardous to the health of Moscow residents.

In 2011, according to media reports, "shoes and coats suffered from the reagents," and "the city authorities had to think about replacing land on the lawns along the roads." Not only townspeople complained, but also environmentalists and representatives of public organizations. Therefore, “the products of the Ural plant of anti-icing materials were abandoned not only in Moscow” Instead of the optimal 40-50 grams of substance per square meter, the wipers needed all 200. So, if in 2010 the maximum salt “dose” for Moscow did not exceed 148 thousand tons per winter , now it has grown to 420 thousand.

“The negative consequences of using increased amounts of salts are already quite obvious,” says Dmitry Khomyakov, head of the Department of Agroinformatics, Faculty of Soil Science, Moscow State University. “We sense them, and our data show negative impacts on soil and green spaces.” According to the scientist, Moscow lives in conditions of the strongest salt stress, and if fundamental changes do not follow, "the soil will begin to degrade." And further, Khomyakov warns, "we will lose the trees that grow along the roads."

Thus, it seems that for the sake of personal financial interests and, possibly, the interests of the family of the former Minister of Natural Resources Yuri Trutnev, Mr. Kulbachevsky made a very profitable business out of protecting the ecology of Moscow. And he doesn't care about the health of the Muscovites themselves ...

Sobyanin bets on oligarchs, or "Deripaska factor"?

Against the background of more frequent scandals involving Kulbachevsky, it is not clear why Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin still does not fire him ?! However, if the mayor of the capital gives the departments to the ministers-oligarchs, then everything is clear. Here you can recall the head of the Department of Culture Kapkov, who previously worked with the billionaire Abramovich, or the head of the Department of Transport Liksutov, who previously worked with the oligarch Makhmudov.

But with whom, then, does Kulbachevsky work? Who is his patron from the oligarchic environment? As you know, now the Moscow authorities use a new reagent based on bischofite (magnesium chloride) for cleaning roads in winter.

But bischofite is dangerous and ineffective! So Dmitry Khomyakov, who in 2009 headed the commission for the state environmental examination of the project of the technology of cleaning roadways in Moscow, wrote in his conclusion that “the use of magnesium chloride or bischofite is not desirable due to its high viscosity, small temperature range of operation, toxicity and dangers to plants and animals ”.

Bischofite contains up to 70 elements of the periodic table, which the manufacturers themselves proudly say. There is a lot of selenium, mercury, fluorine, cadmium, bromine. But the main element of bischofite is six-water magnesium chloride (MgCl2x6H2O) !!!

By the way, when this reagent evaporates, its harmful vapors enter the lungs of Muscovites! Rumor has it that not only people and animals suffer from this reagent, but also roads, and with them - the wheels of cars!

But why then did Sergei Sobyanin decide to spend colossal taxpayers' money in order to purchase 16 thousand tons of this new potentially dangerous reagent? Why didn't the head of the environmental department Kulbachevsky oppose bischofite ?!

Is it because this reagent is produced by Rusal Bishofit LLC, a structural subdivision of the Rusal holding owned by the notorious Oleg Deripaska? And didn't Deripaska "share" anything with Sobyanin and Kulbachevsky in order to lobby his interests ?!

It seems that without the consent of the mayor, Kulbachevsky cannot "close his eyes" to how chemicals pollute the capital. So, to all appearances, Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin is also involved in the "environmental schemes" that make it possible to withdraw billions from the Moscow budget! And it seems that Kulbachevsky's support will still “backfire” on Sobyanin in the upcoming elections to the Moscow City Duma (MHD), because the residents of the capital will not vote for the city government that deliberately “poisons them with chemicals” ...

E-mail address:

Reception of the population:

Manager's blog:

General information:

Was born in 1967 in Moscow. In 1989 he graduated with honors from the Higher Naval School named after V.I. M.V. Frunze. In 2013, he received a second higher education at the Russian Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation with a degree in State and Municipal Administration, specialization in Ecology and Environmental Management. Class rank: State Councilor of the Russian Federation, 3rd class, actual state councilor of the city of Moscow, 1st class.

Labor activity: 1984-1991 - Service in the Armed Forces of the USSR, 1991-1996 - Work in commercial structures, 1996-2003 - Researcher at the Laboratory of Chemical Sensors and Determination of Gas-Forming Impurities at the Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry. V.I. Vernadsky, 2003-2005 - Advisor to the Chairman of the State Committee of the Russian Federation for Fisheries, 2005-2006. - Specialist in economic security of OJSC Irkutskgazprom, 2006-2007. - Chief Specialist of the Department of State Control and Supervision of Forests and Specially Protected Natural Areas of the Regional Directorate of Rosprirodnadzor for the Central Federal District, 2007-2008. - Head of the Department of State Control and Supervision of Forests and Specially Protected Natural Areas of the Department of Rosprirodnadzor for the Central Federal District, Deputy Head of the Department of Rosprirodnadzor for the Central Federal District, 2008-2010. - Head of the Department of Rosprirodnadzor for the Central Federal District, November 10, 2010 was appointed Head of the Department of Nature Management and Environmental Protection of the city of Moscow.

He was awarded the badge of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation "Honorary Worker of Nature Protection", the badge of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation "Excellence in Environmental Protection", the honorary badge of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation "For Excellence in Service", a commendation from the Mayor of Moscow, and a medal of the Order of Merit to the Fatherland, II degree.

Swimming, playing soccer, singing, reading fiction

Favorite place in Moscow

“I love Moscow in all its diversity. But I especially like to walk in natural parks when I have free time. It is so nice to listen to birdsong, admire the flowers, communication with nature helps to recuperate. "